Difference between revisions of "For the 2nd time in less than a week reports of Facebook removing pictures it deems profane or demeaning have individuals slamming the social media titan"

From E-learn Portal
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
On [https://www.pcb.its.dot.gov/PageRedirect.aspx?redirectedurl=http://apn.iteminfo.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=nudismhq.com/contents/29348110/2.html nudism] , the Daily Mail reported that Facebook got rid of a photo of a girl sitting in a bathtub with her elbows leaning on the sides of the bath. Facebook mentioned the image broken the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, which says: &quot;You will not upload content that: is hate speech, threatening, or adult; incites physical violence; or contains nudity or gratuitous or explicit physical violence.&quot;.<br />According to Facebook, it will get rid of images &quot;if they consist of nudity, substance abuse or another profane content. In [https://www.treasury.gov/cgi-bin/redirect.cgi/?http://marilynseiler.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=nudist-photo.com/albums/why-not-tell-me.html beach babes] assaults an added specific or team, it'll be gotten rid of too.&quot;.<br /> [http://daf.csulb.edu/cgi-bin/rd.pl?u=http://www.transitaire.info/cgi-bin/erawan/smartframe.cgi?https://nudist8.top/videos/were-out-taking-pictures.html beach blondes] was published by the internet publication Concepts of the Deep Comprehension of Things as a evaluation of Facebook's policy of erasing obscene images.<br /><br /><br />Theories released on it's Facebook page: &quot;&quot;So, below's last evening's FB alertness test outcomes: FB mediators can not inform an elbow from a dangerous, unclean, extraordinary and violent female breast.)<br />
+
Facebook mentioned the image broken the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, which says: &quot;You will not upload material that: is hate language, threatening, or mature; incites physical violence; or contains nudity or gratuitous or explicit physical violence.&quot;.<br />Based on [http://ge.tt/1fc4jC63/v/0 nudist] , it will eliminate pictures &quot;if they consist of nudity, substance abuse or another profane content. In [https://www.scribd.com/document/471660067/FKKs-Naked-Halloween-Celebration-2012-in-NYCqmnip-pdf naturism] attacks an added specific or team, it will be gotten rid of too.&quot;.<br /> [http://www.filedropper.com/the2000shavebeenactiveyearscyzct beach party] was released by the internet publication Theories of the Profound Understanding of Things as a test of Facebook's policy of erasing obscene pictures. Within 24 hours of the publishing, Facebook erased the picture because it believed the elbows were actually breasts according to Gawker.<br /> [https://sendit.cloud/yw8hez7j2gsz beach girl] released on it's Facebook page: &quot;&quot;So, below's last evening's FB alertness test results: FB mediators can't inform an elbow from a dangerous, unclean, extraordinary and violent female breast.)

Latest revision as of 21:39, 8 August 2020

Facebook mentioned the image broken the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, which says: "You will not upload material that: is hate language, threatening, or mature; incites physical violence; or contains nudity or gratuitous or explicit physical violence.".
Based on nudist , it will eliminate pictures "if they consist of nudity, substance abuse or another profane content. In naturism attacks an added specific or team, it will be gotten rid of too.".
beach party was released by the internet publication Theories of the Profound Understanding of Things as a test of Facebook's policy of erasing obscene pictures. Within 24 hours of the publishing, Facebook erased the picture because it believed the elbows were actually breasts according to Gawker.
beach girl released on it's Facebook page: ""So, below's last evening's FB alertness test results: FB mediators can't inform an elbow from a dangerous, unclean, extraordinary and violent female breast.)