Agen Sbobet88 Terpercaya di Android

From E-learn Portal
Jump to: navigation, search

sexuality, instead of promoting healthy body toleration.50
36. Entire nudity is antithetic to the elaborate semi-porn of the fashion industry.
fighting but at precisely the same time re-kindling this desire--a self-perpetuating process is inevitably set in motion. In
fact modesty can never really achieve its ultimate end except through its disappearance. Concealing under the cloak of
modesty there are to be found many vital elements of the sexual urge itself." 51
37. 52
At various times in Western history distinct parts of female human body have been eroticized: bellies and
thighs in the Renaissance; buttocks, breasts, and thighs by the late 1800s (and comparatively diminutive waistlines and
bellies). Underwear layout has historically stressed these erogenous body parts: corsets in the 1800s deemphasized
the midriff and stressed the breasts--using stuff including whalebone and steel; the crinoline in
the mid 1800s emphasized the midsection; as well as the bustle, appearing in 1868, accentuated the buttocks.53 Bathing suit
design now focuses attention on the breasts and pubic region.
E.B. Hurlock writes: "When primitive folks are unaccustomed to wearing clothing, setting it on for the
first time does not decrease their immorality, as the women of missionary societies believe it will. It's only the
opposite effect. It attracts attention to the human body, particularly for all those parts of it that are covered for the first time." 54
Rob Boyte notes wryly that "fabric individuals, when they do strip in front of others, typically do it for fire, and find
the bikini design tanlines alluring.
Reveals how clothes patterns become a fetish of the body." 55 Havelock Ellis writes: "In Case the conquest of sexual
desire were the first and last concern of life it'd be more practical to forbid clothes than to forbid
nakedness." 56
38. The fashion industry rides on the sex appeal of clothes.
Peter Fryer writes: "The changes in women's trends are essentially determined by the demand to maintain
men's sexual attraction, and consequently to transfer the principal zone of lusty display once a given portion of the body has
been saturated with appealing power to the point of satiation. . . .
erogenous zone to replace the zone which, for the time being, is played out." 57
39. Differences of clothes between the genders focus attention on sex differences.58
Psychologist J.C. Flugel writes: "There seems to be (notably in modern life) no vital component in the
nature, habits, or functions of both genders that would necessitate a striking difference of costume--other than the
desire to accentuate gender differences themselves; an accentuation that mainly serves the end of more readily and
Often arousing sexual desire." 59
40. Many psychologists think that clothing may initially have developed, in part, as a way of
focusing sexual focus.60
41. Partial clothes is more sexually arousing (in commonly unhealthy ways) than total nudity.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/ff-naturist/beach-femdom.html writes: "The more essential clothing is, the more meaning attaches to its absence and the
more consciousness is created about any relation between both states." 61 Elizabeth B. https://s3.amazonaws.com/ff-naturist/nude-on-beach.html that "it's
unquestionably a well known fact that recognizable things arouse no fascination, while concealment brings enchantment and
stimulates interest . . . a draped body with just enough covering to suggest the outline, is far more alluring than a
Completely nude body." 62 And Lee Baxandall detects, "the 'virtually'-nude beaches, where bikinis and thongs are
paraded, are more sexually titillating than a clothing-optional resort or beach. What is natural is more fulfilling,


63
42. [https:/s3.amazonaws.com/last-naturist/family-nudists.html https:/s3.amazonaws.com/last-naturist/family-nudists.html] --notably imposed modesty--simply adds to sexual attraction and desire.64
Reena Glazer writes: "Women's breasts are sexually stimulating to (heterosexual) men, at least in part
Because they're openly inaccessible; society further eroticizes the female breast by labeling it shameful to expose.
This component of the forbidden merely perpetuates the extreme male reaction female exposure allegedly
inspires." 65
43. Topfree66 inequality (requiring girls, but not men, to wear tops) produces an unhealthy fixation
with breasts as sexual objects.
44. The identification of breasts as sexual objects in our culture has caused the discouragement of breastfeeding,
the encouragement of unnecessary cosmetic surgery for breast augmentation, and avoidance of necessary
breast examinations by women.