Donwload site

fast file site

Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud must be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! p2p 순위 I need to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You will need to share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks in it. It's far better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you should discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect with other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not account for cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.



There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)



Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.